September 26, 2008

“A Goodbye to Shea Stadium From the Cockpit”

A Goodbye to Shea Stadium From the Cockpit – NYTimes.com

“You are so low and close you can see it and almost smell it,” said Glen Millen, who estimates that he has flown into and out of La Guardia 1,800 times since he began flying for American Airlines in 1986.

La Guardia is one of the few airports in the country where pilots use land markers instead of instruments to guide their landings, along with Seattle (a shopping mall) and Washington (a river). Shea Stadium, which from the sky looks like a blue circle with a green center, is a primary runway guidepost. For one of the more common landing routes, pilots are instructed to follow the Long Island Expressway until they arrive at the eastern side of the stadium, at which point they bank the plane left around the outfield wall and head straight for Runway 31.

Among pilots and air-traffic controllers, it is known as the “expressway visual approach.”

[snip]

Until the 1980s, when radios that were used in cockpits to pick up transmitters began to be phased out, some pilots would tune them to the local broadcasts of the Mets’ games during landing and take-off.

“You would dial in and you could hear your plane fly over,” said Sam Mayer, a pilot with American Airlines since 1990. “There were guys who would goose the throttles to make a louder noise so they could hear themselves on the radio.”

I never knew that Shea was a landmark for aviation. How unusual.

I’m glad was able to go to Shea one last time earlier this summer before it is demolished.

To the right, you can see Citi Field being constructed. While the brick work is nice (reminds me of Camden), it’s not as iconic as the blue-ness of Shea.

I’ve never been to the old Yankee stadium, and apparently I never will!

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 10:48 am

September 24, 2008

Fail – not just an Internet meme anymore!

When I saw this photos yesterday on a blog, I thought it was a mashup of Internet memes. Apparently, it’s a real photo!

A demonstrator holds up a sign behind US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (left) and Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke during Senate a hearing at Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Bernanke has said the US economic outlook may be “quite adverse” without a stabilization soon in troubled financial markets.

What? No Fail Whale?

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 8:47 am

September 22, 2008

Vacation ideas for January

It looks like I need to take a vacation in Early-Mid January. “need” is due to the fact that my vacation day cup runneth over, and that school is out during this time.

I’m open to recommendations. Ideally it would be a place that has service via American Airlines so I can use my increasingly devaluing miles. I’ve ruled out London (though I love that place) due to British pound depresses me, and that it gets 1.75 hours of sunlight.

Thoughts?

Comments (1) -- Posted by: dtc @ 11:32 pm

September 21, 2008

“Kiss of Death – Contract Provisions Entrepreneurs Should Avoid at All Costs”

Linked from Guy Kawasaki’s twitter feed. The page has full descriptions of the points below. An interesting read. It presents a compelling case for all those “Powered by…” branding that you see.

Kiss of Death – Contract Provisions Entrepreneurs Should Avoid at All Costs | infoChachkie
Kiss of Death Provisions

The allure to of a company-changing deal with a BDC is strong. Big companies make a number of seductive promises, including access to large markets, significant financial resources and vital public validation of your solution see Pulp Facts. However, fight the urge to close such enticing deals on the BDC’s terms. Stand your ground and negotiate a fair agreement, even if it takes longer and forces you to expend more energy than you would prefer.

To this end, never agree to any of the following Kiss of Death Provisions when negotiating with a BDC, no matter how lucrative the potential relationship:

Allow the Other Side to Draft the Agreement
Deploy a Free Pilot
Cut a Multi-year Agreement
Lock Down the Escape Hatches
Give up Branding
Relinquish Press Release Capabilities
Approve Unilateral Provisions
Accept Unlimited Liability
Forgo Change of Control or Agree to a ROFO or ROFR
Serve up World-wide Distribution
Relinquish Joint Intellectual Property Rights
Execute an Ambiguous Statement of Work
Agree to Bundling Without a Minimum Price
Grant Most Favored Nations Status
Issue Unmitigated Exclusivity

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 5:30 pm

September 18, 2008

Need some explanation about the Wall St meltdown and AIG?

Could Wall Street Woes Set Off A Crisis? : NPR
“The Fed and the Treasury are very, very worried about the stability of the economy,” Greenberger says. “They’re worried about what this means to Main Street, about what it means to you and me. … In the absence of this rather dramatic move I think they believe that we would enter something much deeper, possibly, than a recession.”

This is a great interview that helps explain how AIG got into trouble, what the consequences of not bailing out Lehman was, why regulation of CDSes is banned by law, what CDSes are, and why things are only going to get worse.

Check it out – well worth your 38 minutes. Note that the link to interview is right below the headline of the page. Midway on the page there is another link, but that goes to an interview from 4/3 – also a great interview and on the same topic.

Great stuff!

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 11:23 am

September 17, 2008

Latest innovation from California: mandatory free loans to the state

I don’t envy the position our state lawmakers are in. Passing a budget that requires a 2/3rds majority, in a state where no seats are ever up grabs because of district funkiness, and where Democrats refuse to cut spending and Republicans refuse to pass new taxes? Instant recipe for a stalemate.

They say that California leads in innovation, and I must say I find this budget gap fixing instrument to be pretty innovative:

SignOnSanDiego.com > News > State — Compromise budget skips long-term solutions
Paychecks for Californians could shrink with a 10 percent increase in withholding for state income taxes, yielding $1.6 billion. The total amount of tax paid would not increase, and any over-collection would be refunded.

That’s right even though the top state income tax bracket is 9.3%, this budget which the Democratic-majority, Republican-controlled State Assembly  (it makes sense, really) passed indicates that we will now have to withhold 10%. The extra will be refunded the next year.

Wow.

Really, you can’t tell me that another state has thought of doing this before. This has got to be precedent setting. And this is just one of the many techniques to fix the $17 billion deficit gap.

And while our budget is now 78 days over due, I’d have to agree with Schwarzenegger in vetoing this budget.

State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, a Democrat, also assailed the budget plan, saying this morning that it “gives gimmicks a bad name.”

“It’s banana republic financing,” Lockyer said. The spending plan relies on “phony money and phony estimates.”

Update at 7 p.m. ET: “When they send me the budget, I will veto it,” Schwarzenegger said at a Capitol news conference, the Los Angeles Times reports. “If my veto is overriden,” he said, ” … hundreds of bills will be vetoed.”

Oh boy.

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 12:11 am

September 10, 2008

A great lose-lose situation

R.O.I. – WSJ.com
Super-billionaire Warren Buffett warns that the federal bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could end up costing the taxpayers “hundreds of billions of dollars” if the housing market continues to slump. But Mr Buffett, the worlds richest man, defended the controversial bailout as necessary nonetheless.

“It all depends on what housing does,” he told me from the sidelines of Bostons Fenway Park, where he was appearing to throw out the ceremonial first pitch on Tuesday night. “If housing falls off another 15 or 20%, theyre going to lose some real money” on the bailout. The “they” means “the government,” which actually means, “you”.

As a taxpaying renter, I’m pretty appalled at how this situation has panned out. As if not enough of my my tax dollars were subsidizing mortgage holders, keeping housing expensive, apparently even more of my tax dollars will be heading in this direction. What a rigged system.

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 10:21 am

September 8, 2008

You don’t owe the hospital/doctor what insurance won’t pay?

One of the things that really bugs me is how complicated, messy, and time consuming dealing with health care bills are. I work for a company with one of the nation’s best coverages (almost no copays on anything) and I’m in generally good health – and still looking at EOBs, doctors invoices, etc for my wife and I confuse the crap out of me. I can only wonder how this is for most other people!

Here’s today’s shocker, courtesy of my fav blog consumerist:

Medical Bills You Shouldnt Pay
As health-care costs continue to soar, millions of confused consumers are paying medical bills they dont actually owe. Typically this occurs when an insurance plan covers less than what a doctor, hospital, or lab service wants to be paid. The health-care provider demands the balance from the patient. Uncertain and fearing the calls of a debt collector, the patient pays up.

Most consumers dont realize it, but this common practice, known as balance billing, often is illegal. When doctors or hospitals think an insurer has reimbursed too little, state and federal laws generally bar the medical providers from pressuring patients to pay the difference. Instead, doctors and hospitals should be wrangling directly with insurers. Economists and patient advocates estimate that consumers pay $1 billion or more a year for which theyre not responsible.

Amazing! This is almost as odious as the fact that doctors and hospitals are now offering credit cards and upselling patients on services. I love this quote:

As some authorities get tougher, physicians are trying to overturn prohibitions on balance billing. The American Medical Assn. is lobbying Congress to allow balance billing within the Medicare program, as was allowed until 1991. Two Republican congressmen, Tom Feeney of Florida and Tom Price of Georgia, have sponsored legislation that would accomplish that goal. The AMA cites declining reimbursements from Medicare and private insurers in support of its bid to bill patients directly. AMA member David McKalip, a neurosurgeon in St. Petersburg, Fla., says patients can trust doctors to behave ethically and not gouge the poor: “Doctors will know up front which patients are willing to pay” beyond what the government reimburses.

Seriously? I love this counter example:

The case began in December 1995, when Siglinger’s wife, Laura, and his daughter, Allison, then three, were injured in a car accident. Both were taken to the emergency room at Bridgeport Hospital, where Dr. Charles Gianetti, the plastic surgeon on call, stitched a cut on Allison’s face. The Siglingers’ insurer paid Gianetti $1,981 under a contract with the family’s health plan. Later in 1996, he claimed the Siglingers owed him an unpaid balance of $4,496. The Siglingers refused to pay, and Gianetti sued them. Ruling for the Siglingers, the trial judge ordered Gianetti to pay their legal fees, in addition to the punitive damages. The Siglingers say he hasn’t paid them anything.

“It was traumatic enough seeing my daughter go through a serious accident, but then to go through this,” says Siglinger, a real estate investor. He and his wife have since divorced; Allison is now 15. “I wonder how many people paid these bills without giving it a second thought,” he says. The Siglingers are among 150 patients Gianetti has sued for unpaid balances, according to state records. The Connecticut Attorney General’s Office is scheduled to go to trial next year against Gianetti, having accused him in a civil suit of improper billing.

Gianetti, 69, no longer practices medicine, but he continues to pursue former patients in court. He says the state of Connecticut has “nothing on me,” declining other comment.

I don’t pretend to have any solutions for fixing our health care solution. And I’m keenly aware that the solutions in other countries have their own pros and cons – but it just seems to me that we really ought to be able to do better than the status quo.

Click here to post a comment -- Posted by: dtc @ 10:57 am